| | |  | Sandwich Cookies | Home » » » » Snackwell's Creme Sandwich Cookies, 7.75-Ounce Boxes (Pack of 12) | | | | | | | Description: | | Snackwell's creme sandwich cookies, 7.75-ounce boxes (pack of 12) contains a classic sandwich cookie taste with none of that guilt and is perfect for dunking in milk | | | Features: | |
• Case of 12 7.75-ounce boxes of sandwich cookies (93 total ounces)
• Crunchy cookies with a layer of vanilla cream
• Cholesterol-free; no trans fats; low in calories
• Classic sandwich cookie taste with none of that guilt
• Perfect for dunking in milk
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 12.0 inches | | Product Width:
| 12.0 inches | | Product Height:
| 12.0 inches | | Product Weight:
| 7.75 pounds | | Package Length:
| 10.3 inches | | Package Width:
| 9.6 inches | | Package Height:
| 8.6 inches | | Package Weight:
| 7.75 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 20 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 20 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
 GREAT COOKIES IF THEY ARE FRESH!Jul 25, 2010
By MARY W.
Nabisco Snack Wells Creme Sandwich Cookies 1.7 oz. (Pack of 12) 20.4 oz. net
I purchased these cookies in the store several times and thought they were a great alternative to other indulgences. When I saw them on Amazon, I thought it would be a super savings. However, these cookies must be fresh, or they are simply not worth eating. The photo above is a very good sample of some very old and dried out cookies. When they were received in fresh condition, they were excellent, with soft moist cake and marshmallow and a chocolate coating that was a solid, shiney dark brown. In this photo above you can see a very dried out product with an old and pale, discolored coating. I ordered 3 seperate times, 1st box was "great" other two were not even edible. 1 FOR 3 MAKES THEM A VERY POOR VALUE.Nabisco Snack Wells Creme Sandwich Cookies 1.7 oz. (Pack of 12) 20.4 oz. net
Loaded with sugars and contains undeclared fats; not a health foodMay 13, 2012
By Current Resident
People, learn how to read nutrition labels. Servings are typically divided into just one or two cookies. Two cookies contain about 100 calories, 24 g carbohydrates and 14 g sugars. The calorie breakdown is over 90% carbohydrates, mostly from sugars. This is a BIG red flag. No one should consume junk like this. Don't be misled by the "Fat Free" label. (see second paragraph) Refined sugars are far, far worse for dieters than fats are; poly- and monounsaturated fats are in fact beneficial, and calories from fat provide more stable energy. With the exception of trans and saturated fats, (they raise bad cholesterol) you really shouldn't be on a low-fat diet. Sugars are the worst thing for dieters, as they aren't as likely to be metabolized as energy, and will typically be stored as body fat. (mostly around the mid-section) High-fructose corn syrup (an ingredient in SnackWell's products) is specifically linked with an increased risk of obesity and diabetes. The human body simply is not meant to metabolize this much sugar, nor sugars that are unnaturally processed. I can't provide links to research on the subject, because Amazon has rather ridiculous policies that censor URLs, names of other sites, stores, competitors, etc. from reviews. Be sure to complain to Amazon.com about this practice. Still, it's easy enough to open a search engine and type "snackwell devil food nutrition facts" or the like.
Bear in mind that products are not required to declare nutritional content when the servings are divided into small portions, and the content would be less than 0.5 g. Each cookie actually contains 0.17 g saturated fat, which Nabisco neglects to mention. Trans fat content is entirely unaccounted for, though it may actually exist. This means that "Fat Free" claim was just a blatant lie. Will anyone hold Nabisco responsible for unscrupulously deceiving consumers, though? Can anyone demand that they pull misleading products off the shelf? Nope. Welcome to corporate America.
Don't let Nabisco and other "health-conscience" snack companies scam you. Read labels closely, and be suspicious of small servings. If a single serving contains less than 0.5 g trans fat, then it doesn't have to be declared; the label will inaccurately specify 0 g. If the portions seem ridiculously small, then it's safe to assume they're trying to hide something from the consumer.
On a side note, please ignore "helpful review" ratings. Re-distributors of products will often vote down critical reviews, because they demote the very products they're trying to sell on Amazon. It's all politics.
 Son has maintained weight loss with these cookiesApr 19, 2009
By flash
Weight loss camp recommended these as a snack, and they have helped my son
maintain his weight along with many factors. He enjoys them and doesn't feel deprived in the low fat diet our family adopted after his weight loss of 40 lbs.
Thank Goodness For These Little Tasty SnacksMar 30, 2009
By D. Mikels
"It's always Happy Hour here"
I could eat a devils food cake a day. . .but then, I'd be so big I would require my own zip code. So I'm darn glad the folks at Nabisco came up with SNACKWELL'S DEVILS FOOD COOKIES. These are the real deal: a little devils food cake, surrounded by a marshmellow layer, covered in chocolate. Zero fat, zero cholesterol, only 50 calories--but this little snack sure doesn't taste like no fat/no cholesterol. It tastes like sheer indulgence, and that's always a good thing.
So I always keep a box around when the sweet tooth starts to take over and I'm needing some guilt-free pleasure. SNACKWELL'S DEVILS FOOD COOKIES. Devilishly good.
--D. Mikels, Esq.
good and inexpensiveNov 09, 2008
By Robert Solomon
"drrob1"
When ordered this way, they are < 1/2 the cost I've seen in local vending machines. If you like these cookies, this is the best way to buy them. Be careful or you may become a cookie monster.
See all 20 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
