| | |  | Incontinence | Home » » » » Depend for Women Underwear, [Extra-Large], Maximum Absorbency, 14-Count Packages, (Pack of 4) | | | | | | | Description: | | Depend Super Absorbent Female Underwear,Extra-Large, 14-Count Packages (case pack of 4) | | | Features: | |
• Superior protection in a classic women's style brief
• Maximum absorbency captures and locks in odor
• Underwear-like waistband soft and comfortable against the skin
• Protection while active with all-around leg elastics
• Made in the USA from domestic and imported materials
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Weight:
| 2.35 pounds | | Package Length:
| 19.5 inches | | Package Width:
| 11.5 inches | | Package Height:
| 9.5 inches | | Package Weight:
| 9.0 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 34 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 34 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
13 of 13 found the following review helpful:
 "Work In Process" Diapers means DEFECTSJul 01, 2011
By V. M.
"PC Enthusiast"
July 1 2011
I have been purchasing the Depend Maximum/Super Absorbency Plus Pull-Up Diapers for my mother for the last 3 years. I usually purchase the 18, 26/28 or 20 count packages in the "GREEN and MAGENTA" plastic package. However, I thought I was getting a good deal by purchasing the 16 count packages that came 4 packs to a box so I bought 3 cases.
When the Depends arrived, the 16-count, 4-packs were in brown cardboard boxes with BOLD TYPE on all sides of the box that read "WORK IN PROCESS". The 16-count packages were NOT in the customary GREEN and Magenta plastic bags, but rather in PLAIN WHITE/Generic and unmarked bags with NO LABELING whatsoever.
We are FINALLY on the last case of diapers and this is what we have discovered with each and every pair of WORK IN PROCESS diapers:
1) The Center Strip that you line up the Depend Boost Insert with is either too far forward or too far back and placing the boost pad in the wrong spot can add to leakage.
2) The Center Strip on all the diapers is off to the far right edge of the diaper, leaving less coverage on the middle and left side of the diaper.
3) The padding in the diaper is not uniformly thick; to the extent that on many pairs, there are marble-size chunks of padding missing and you can see through from the inside to the back side of the diaper.
4) The sizes (all supposedly LARGE) are not consistent either. Some are tight-fitting, some just right, others downright baggy. Some have a snug left-leg opening with a too-large right-leg opening.
I contacted the manufacturer, Kimberly Clark, who told me that when the machine that "lines-up" the center strip in the padded section of the diaper is "off-center or off-mark" or there are defects in the padding or other defects in the diapers, they will package the the defective merchandise in bulk/white, unlabeled packaging, mark the cases as "Work In Process" and sell them to 3rd party wholesalers for resale.
I did not contact the seller as this was the fault of the manufacturer for foisting it's rejects on an unsuspecting public.
The Seller shipped the product in a timely manner and I would have no problem ordering some other product from them in the future. I will, however, be very careful in ordering BULK items from anyone in the future.
If I were you, I would only order single-item Depend products (except for Depend BOOST inserts, which appear to be fine).
Depend for Women Underwear, [Large], Maximum Absorbency, 16-Count Packages (Pack of 4)
15 of 16 found the following review helpful:
 Good Deal ... butApr 19, 2010
By Betsy
This was purchased through Subsccribe and Save and the end cost was considerably better than all other stores including Target. The "... but" is that S&S tried to send my next shipment describing it as "Super Plus" but in fact it was "Super" (in their written text and product picture). Switching products on an automatic recurring purchase is absolutely inappropriate. One star for the dishonesty, 5 stars for the product and price. This has happened on other S&S "deals" and I've left the program.
9 of 9 found the following review helpful:
 SAME PRODUCT - MORE CONVENIENT & CHEAPERMar 29, 2010
By KRIS
"SUPER SHOPPER"
My daughter had an injury at 6 which led to a brain tumor at 9. She has a variety of issues which a young lady should not have to deal with. This service keeps her in product, is less expensive since there is no financial assistance for these products & we don't have to haul the large boxes from the store. The system is working well for us! A mom
6 of 6 found the following review helpful:
 Depends Soft Peach... SucksSep 14, 2011
By snub
This newer version (soft peach) sucks, I like the original white version, which is more durable. These tear very easily. Therefore, I've waste several pair. If I'm unable to get the orignal Large Depend Maximum Absorbency then I will not purchase this newer version. Which is also less absorbant. I truly think this is positively not an improvement. They need more testing to measure up to the original White Depend.
4 of 4 found the following review helpful:
Mom likes this productSep 19, 2009
By A. Altman
"Art"
Mom is picky about this stuff. She insists on this brand and this model. When she's happy, we're happy.
See all 34 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
![Depend for Men Underwear, [Large/Extra-Large], Maximum Absorbency, 16-Count Packages (Pack of 4)](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51DzY4Nu2%2BL._SL75_.jpg "Depend for Men Underwear, [Large/Extra-Large], Maximum Absorbency, 16-Count Packages (Pack of 4)")
![Depend Adjustable Underwear, [Small/Medium], Maximum Absorbency, 18-Count Packages (Pack of 4)](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51MRgn91NJL._SL75_.jpg "Depend Adjustable Underwear, [Small/Medium], Maximum Absorbency, 18-Count Packages (Pack of 4)")
